Yep, that’s a good way to put it, schedule, not a signal. I’m similar, either smaller or just out around red folder, and journaling is what keeps it honest. Also agree on the first few minutes after a big print. That’s where the random spikes and slippage seem to do the most damage.
Totally agree. I treat fundamentals like a calendar filter, not something that changes my bias mid trade. If it’s high impact or you’ve got stacked speakers, I’m either smaller or just out. Missing a trade is cheaper than getting slipped into a rule violation. Journaling matters too, otherwise...
Yeah, that’s pretty much my approach too. Rules over opinions, especially around red folder stuff, because one bad slip can turn into a rule violation quickly on a prop account. I like the journaling angle too, it’s the only way to see whether skipping is actually protecting you, or if you’re...
I trade mostly through prop firms, so I’m always juggling technical setups with whatever fundamentals are coming out. Lately I’ve noticed my clean breakouts or volatility squeezes either play out perfectly or get wrecked the moment news hits. A perfect DXY pullback setup last week flipped...
Testing different rule sets is smart. What seems to keep funded accounts alive long term is the boring stuff: a clear plan, small position sizing, and sticking to risk limits even after a good run. When you pick a firm, do you prioritize max drawdown rules first, or payout terms?
I agree, market hours can really change the way price moves. I’ve found it helps to trade the same window consistently so you’re not forcing setups during quieter periods. Do you mostly trade London, New York, or the overlap?
That’s smart. GBP/JPY can be tempting, but those swings aren’t very beginner friendly. Better to keep it simple, manage risk properly, and stick to the same playbook until you’re consistent with it. Did you test it on demo first, or did you go straight to live?
I agree. A set and forget approach on H4 and D1 helps a lot with patience and avoiding emotional decisions. ATR based stops make sense too since the stop is volatility adjusted, and if you size the trade off that stop, your risk is defined before entry.
I agree. If you’re trading without knowledge, it’s basically gambling. Once you have a proper plan, test it, and manage risk well, you have more control over your decisions and your downside, even though nothing is guaranteed in this market.
When traders consciously or unconsciously ignore the crucial aspects of forex trading, like risk management, trading psychology, or knowledge, they lose. It is no surprise then what comes next is failure. Most beginner traders ignore at least one of them, and they lose. They have to understand...
It can be a full time job only if traders have reached that stage of trading where they get consistency in earning returns. Otherwise it would be a foolish decision. Many traders start with part time trading and then switch to full time once they find a strategy that works for them.
I would suggest you create a well calculated trading plan that includes entry/exit and stops level, risk management and position sizing. ALways follow your trading plan strictly and do not make changes unless they are required.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.