Phantom
Member
Afterprime recently shifted their 2.0 platform to an invite-only system, and it’s sparked a lot of debate. On one hand, it’s a barrier to entry; on the other, it’s designed to protect the liquidity pool from "toxic flow" (latency arb, etc.).
I’ve been digging into the specs for those who do get in:
Execution: Average sub-50ms (clean A-Book, no internalization).
Pricing: 43% lower cost than the Top 10 average retail brokers.
Platforms: Support for TraderEvolution which, IMO, blows MT4 out of the water for Level 2 Depth of Market.
For the serious traders here—do you prefer a "come one, come all" broker with high commissions, or are you willing to jump through the "Invite-Only" hoops for institutional-grade fills and $0 commissions? Curious to hear from anyone who has their 2.0 credentials already.
I’ve been digging into the specs for those who do get in:
Execution: Average sub-50ms (clean A-Book, no internalization).
Pricing: 43% lower cost than the Top 10 average retail brokers.
Platforms: Support for TraderEvolution which, IMO, blows MT4 out of the water for Level 2 Depth of Market.
For the serious traders here—do you prefer a "come one, come all" broker with high commissions, or are you willing to jump through the "Invite-Only" hoops for institutional-grade fills and $0 commissions? Curious to hear from anyone who has their 2.0 credentials already.
