The Weekly Rundown with PlexyTrade📊

Revaluing Gold: How Washington Could Unlock $800 Billion Without Raising Debt​

For decades, gold has sat on the U.S. balance sheet at a token valuation of $42.22 per ounce—an official figure unchanged for generations—but mounting fiscal strain and a national debt exceeding $37 trillion suggest that number may soon change. In an unusual acknowledgment that gold still holds relevance in U.S. monetary policy, the Federal Reserve recently referenced the metal in an official report, aligning with draft versions of President Trump’s proposed Bitcoin Act circulating in both the Senate and House. These bills explicitly outline a plan to revalue America’s official gold reserves—a process that, if approved, could unfold as early as 2026—to fund new sovereign wealth and Bitcoin reserve initiatives, redefining gold’s statutory value under 31 U.S. Code §5117. Repricing gold to around $3,400 an ounce could instantly “create” nearly $800 billion in debt-neutral liquidity—capital that might finance these funds without formally expanding the federal debt. Supporters hail it as an innovative way to rebalance public finances, while critics warn it mirrors a sophisticated form of quantitative easing that could trigger inflationary shockwaves worldwide. Should the U.S. move forward, other central banks may follow, reanchoring their currencies to tangible assets even as fiat values continue to erode. Whether the goal is to ease America’s debt burden or to redefine reserves for a digital age, the implications are profound: gold—once dismissed as a barbarous relic—may again become the measure of monetary credibility, and the next chapter of U.S. finance could well be written in both gold and code.

Disclaimer: The information discussed reflects ongoing market speculation and legislative proposals. As of now, the U.S. government has not announced or approved any official revaluation of its gold reserves. Figures such as $800 billion in liquidity are based on independent analyst estimates, not formal projections from the Treasury or Federal Reserve.

 

[Elina Ward]

Monday 25 May 2026​

Qualcomm Rebounded Sharply as Stellantis Automotive Momentum Lifted QCOM​

Qualcomm Price Reaction: 18–22 May 2026​

Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) moved through a strong bullish recovery as early-week selling pressure was replaced by aggressive buying momentum into the end of the week. According to the chart, Qualcomm opened at 207.72 on 18 May, dropped to a weekly low of 190.93 on 19 May, then rallied sharply to a weekly high of 242.85 on 22 May, before closing the period at 238.28.

The first part of the move showed weakness. After opening near 207.72, QCOM failed to hold its early level and moved lower into 19 May. The stock reached its weekly low at 190.93, showing that sellers were still active before buyers started to regain control.
The strongest upside reaction appeared later in the week, especially into 22 May 2026, when Qualcomm accelerated sharply higher. External daily market data also showed QCOM closing at 238.16, up 11.60% on 22 May, confirming that the final session carried the main bullish force of the weekly move.

The rally was mainly supported by renewed attention on Qualcomm’s automotive chip business. Stellantis and Qualcomm announced an expanded partnership to adopt Snapdragon Digital Chassis solutions across next-generation vehicle architectures, including cockpit, connectivity, and advanced driver-assistance systems.

This helped strengthen the market’s view that Qualcomm’s growth story was not only tied to smartphones. Qualcomm had already reported fiscal second-quarter revenue of $10.6 billion, while QCT automotive revenue reached $1.326 billion, up 38% year-over-year, showing that the automotive segment had become a key part of the company’s diversification story.

By 22 May 2026, QCOM had reached a weekly high of 242.85 before closing at 238.28. The small pullback from the high showed some profit-taking near the top of the move, but the stock still held most of its weekly advance.

It is important to note that Qualcomm’s movement was not driven by price action alone. The chart reflected a clear shift in sentiment: early weakness pushed the stock to 190.93, but automotive-chip momentum and the Stellantis partnership helped buyers regain control and drive the stock sharply higher into the weekly close.

Price Action Summary​

Movement	From	To	Point Move	% Move	Visual Move
Open to Weekly Close	207.72	238.28	+30.56	+14.71%	+30.56 ↗ / +14.71% ↗
Weekly Low to Weekly High	190.93	242.85	+51.92	+27.19%	+51.92 ↗ / +27.19% ↗

Final Takeaway​

Qualcomm opened the period at 207.72, fell to a weekly low of 190.93 on 19 May, then rallied strongly to a weekly high of 242.85 on 22 May before closing at 238.28. From the weekly low to the weekly high, QCOM gained +51.92 points, equal to +27.19%. From the original 18 May open to the 22 May close, Qualcomm was higher by +30.56 points, equal to +14.71%.

Overall, Qualcomm’s movement from 18 May to 22 May 2026 was mainly driven by the shift from early-week selling pressure into strong late-week buying momentum. The expanded Stellantis partnership gave investors a clear automotive-growth catalyst, while Qualcomm’s recent automotive revenue strength helped support the broader bullish reaction.

Profit Study:​

Imagine catching the weekly low at 190.93 — with just $954.65 in margin, you'd have had a front-row seat to a $5,192 range explosion between 190.93 and 242.85. The beauty? You didn't even need to nail the perfect exit. Closing anywhere inside that range still put money in your pocket.

The chart below illustrates Qualcomm’s movement on a 1-hour candlestick timeframe from 18 May to 22 May 2026.

 

[Elina Ward]

Tuesday 26 May 2026​

BTC/USD Weekly Analysis — 18 May 2026 to 24 May 2026
Timeframe: H1 | Net Move: -0.39% | Range: -5.27% | Sentiment Verdict: Cautiously Bearish

---

BTC/USD experienced a slight decline of -0.39% between May 18 and May 24, 2026, opening at 77439.58 and closing at 77134.14. The week's high was 78181.56, while the low dipped to 74271.16. Macroeconomic factors, particularly rising US Treasury yields and a strengthening dollar driven by hawkish signals from the Federal Reserve's May meeting minutes, played a significant role in the downward pressure. Bitcoin ETFs also saw substantial outflows, contrasting with earlier inflows. Despite the overall bearish sentiment, some on-chain data pointed to strategic accumulation by large holders, raising questions about the longer-term outlook.

---

PRICE ACTION SUMMARY

Metric	Value
Period Open	77,439.58
Period High	78,181.56
Period Low	74,271.16
Period Close	77,134.14
Net Move (Open → Close)	-0.39%
Range Move (High → Low)	-5.27%

78000.00 —

74300.00 —

---

FUNDAMENTAL DRIVERS

MACROECONOMIC
Rising US Treasury yields and a stronger dollar exerted downward pressure on Bitcoin. The Federal Reserve's May meeting minutes suggested a potential shift towards a less accommodative stance, with some participants preferring to remove the "easing bias," increasing the odds of future rate hikes. This macroeconomic environment dampened risk appetite and increased borrowing costs, impacting both institutional and retail investors.

ETF & INSTITUTIONAL FLOWS
Bitcoin ETFs experienced significant outflows, with $1.55 billion exiting the funds since May 14, 2026. This reversal followed strong inflows in April, indicating a shift in institutional sentiment. BlackRock's IBIT and Fidelity's FBTC led the outflows. However, Morgan Stanley's new Bitcoin ETF attracted $264 million in net inflows, showing some continued institutional interest.

ON-CHAIN SIGNALS
On-chain data revealed a divergence between whale and retail activity. Bitcoin's apparent demand fell to its most bearish level of 2026, with new issuance outpacing structural absorption. However, entities holding 1,000+ BTC increased their positions, suggesting strategic accumulation by larger players. The Bitcoin Fund Flow Ratio on Binance also indicated potentially weakening selling pressure.

MARKET STRUCTURE
The CLARITY Act continued to progress through the Senate, aiming to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets in the U.S. The Senate Banking Committee advanced the bill, marking a step towards clearer jurisdictional boundaries between the SEC and CFTC. The act includes provisions related to stablecoin regulation, DeFi, and consumer protection, potentially reshaping how crypto businesses operate.

---

INTERMARKET CORRELATIONS

Asset	Move	Context
S&P 500 (SPX)	+0.9%	Approximate weekly change from 18 May open to 22 May close; risk sentiment improved by the end of the week.
Gold (XAU)	-0.55	Approximate weekly change from 18 May open to 22 May close; price ended slightly lower despite safe-haven demand.
DXY (USD Index)	+0.04%	Approximate weekly change from 18 May open to 22 May close; the dollar ended almost flat.

---

WHAT TO WATCH NEXT

Late May 2026 — Further developments on the CLARITY Act in the Senate
Potential for regulatory clarity to positively impact market sentiment

June 2026 — Next Federal Reserve meeting
Guidance on interest rate policy will influence risk asset valuations

---

CAUTIOUSLY BEARISH

The combination of macroeconomic headwinds and ETF outflows creates a cautious bearish outlook for BTC/USD. While on-chain data offers some counterpoints, the broader market sentiment appears to be tilted towards risk aversion in the short term.

---

Profit Study:​

Imagine catching BTCUSD near the weekly high at 78,181.56. With only around $781.82 in margin, that position would have given exposure to a powerful $3,910.40 price range as the market moved from 78,181.56 down to 74,271.16.


The key point? You would not have needed to exit at the exact low. Even closing anywhere below the entry level within that range could have captured part of the move.

 

[Elina Ward]

XAUUSD Weekly Analysis — 25 May 2026 to 27 May 2026
Timeframe: H1 | Net Move: — | Range: -3.09% | Bias & Key Risk: Cautiously Bearish

---

XAUUSD experienced a notable downturn between May 25 and May 27, 2026, declining approximately 3.00% from a high of $4,580.10 to a low of $4,442.74. Initially, the price rose due to uncertainty surrounding U.S.-Iran tensions and shifting inflation expectations. However, this initial support was short-lived as traders reduced their safe-haven exposure, focusing instead on the potential interest-rate implications of geopolitical events. The market appeared to be caught between optimism regarding a potential U.S.-Iran agreement and concerns about energy-driven inflation. As traders increasingly viewed gold as a Fed-sensitive and inflation-sensitive asset, a brief rally quickly turned into a sharp decline, raising questions about gold's role in a high-rate environment.

---

PRICE ACTION SUMMARY

Metric	Value
Period Open	4,543.10
Period High	4,580.10
Period Low	4,442.74
Range Move (High → Low)	-3.09%

4477.00 —

4430.00 —

---

FUNDAMENTAL DRIVERS

DXY & REAL YIELDS
On May 25, 2026, short-dated U.S. Treasury yields edged higher after the University of Michigan survey showed weak consumer sentiment and a rise in inflation expectations. Federal Reserve Governor Waller argued that the Fed should remove its 'easing bias' from the policy statement, reinforcing expectations of a less accommodative stance. Rising interest rates affect borrowing costs for corporations, mortgage rates for homeowners, and the discount rates used to value future earnings across equity markets. With consumer price inflation at 3.8% annually, the 30-year Treasury yield rose above 5% for the first time in years.

CENTRAL BANK ACTIVITY
Gold is supported by solid central bank purchases, with the People's Bank of China (PBoC) in its 17th consecutive month of buying. Central bank purchases have been one of the key drivers for the precious metal as the geopolitical premium has faded.

GEOPOLITICAL & SAFE HAVEN
Reports indicated that the United States conducted military operations in southern Iran targeting missile launch sites and boats in the Strait of Hormuz on May 25, 2026. These strikes occurred during ongoing ceasefire conditions and negotiations between the United States and Iran, contributing to heightened regional tensions. However, optimism regarding a potential U.S.-Iran agreement also surfaced during the period, putting downward pressure on gold prices.

COT POSITIONING
No significant activity identified for this driver during the period.

---

WHAT TO WATCH NEXT

June 2026 — Federal Reserve Meeting
Potential changes to monetary policy could significantly impact gold prices.

Ongoing — U.S.-Iran Negotiations
Progress or setbacks in negotiations will influence safe-haven demand for gold.

---

**Profit Study:**​

Imagine catching XAUUSD near the weekly high at 4580.10 before the drop.

With just $916.02 margin on 1:500 leverage or $229.00 on 1:2000 leverage, a standard lot position would have given traders exposure to a powerful $13,736 market range as gold moved from 4580.10 to 4442.74.

That is the power of volatility. You did not need to catch the full move perfectly — even a partial position inside that range could have created serious opportunity for traders who were prepared.

The chart below illustrates XAUUSD’s price movement on a 1-hour candlestick timeframe from 25 May to 27 May 2026.

---

CAUTIOUSLY BEARISH

Given the rise in real yields and the potential for further interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve, the outlook for gold is cautiously bearish. Any de-escalation in geopolitical tensions would further reduce safe-haven demand, adding to the downward pressure.

CRITICAL RISK: An unexpected escalation of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East could trigger a flight to safety, boosting gold prices.

---

For informational purposes only. Not financial advice.

 

[Elina Ward]

Thursday 28 May 2026​

Brent Crude Oil Turned Volatile as Hormuz Deal Hopes Clashed With Fresh U.S.–Iran Strikes​

Brent Crude Oil Price Reaction: 25–28 May 2026​

Brent Crude Oil moved through a sharp volatile structure between 25 May and 28 May 2026, as early geopolitical-risk pricing was replaced by heavy selling pressure before buyers returned again. According to the chart, Brent opened at 98.93 on 25 May, climbed to a recent high of 100.62 on 26 May, then dropped sharply to a recent low of 94.57 on 27 May, before recovering to 97.15 by 08:00 GMT on 28 May.
The first part of the move showed early upside momentum. After opening near 98.93, Brent pushed higher into 26 May and reached 100.62, showing that buyers were still active as the market continued to price uncertainty around Middle East supply risks and restricted flows through the Strait of Hormuz.

The strongest downside reaction appeared later, especially into 27 May 2026, when Brent fell sharply from the recent high and reached 94.57. The move came as traders reacted to growing hopes that the United States and Iran were moving closer to a framework that could eventually reopen commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Reuters reported that oil prices had already fallen nearly 7% on 25 May as optimism grew around a possible U.S.–Iran deal, although analysts warned that normal oil flows would not return immediately.

The selling pressure was also supported by reports that Iran’s state TV had obtained a draft framework for a possible memorandum of understanding with the United States. Under that draft, Iran would restore commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz to pre-war levels within one month, while the United States would withdraw military forces from Iran’s vicinity and lift a naval blockade. This reduced part of the geopolitical risk premium that had previously supported oil prices.

However, Brent did not continue lower in a straight line. By 28 May, the market rebounded from 94.57 to 97.15 after fresh military exchanges between the United States and Iran weakened confidence in a clean diplomatic breakthrough. Reuters reported that oil prices jumped after Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said they had targeted a U.S. airbase in response to a U.S. attack near Bandar Abbas. The Wall Street Journal also reported that Brent rose in early European trading after fresh U.S. strikes on Iran renewed supply-risk concerns.

This meant Brent’s movement was not driven by price action alone. The chart reflected a clear shift in sentiment: peace-deal hopes pushed prices lower by removing part of the war-risk premium, while renewed strikes brought back fears that the conflict could continue and keep the Strait of Hormuz disrupted.

By 28 May 2026, Brent had recovered to 97.15, but it was still below its 25 May opening price of 98.93. The late rebound showed that buyers returned after the 27 May sell-off, but the broader move across the period remained negative because Brent failed to reclaim its earlier high near 100.62.

Price Action Summary​

Movement	From	To	Point Move	% Move	Visual Move
Open to Current Price	98.93	97.15	-1.78	-1.80%	-1.78 ↘ / -1.80% ↘
Recent High to Recent Low	100.62	94.57	-6.05	-6.01%	-6.05 ↘ / -6.01% ↘
Recent Low to Current Price	94.57	97.15	+2.58	+2.73%	+2.58 ↗ / +2.73% ↗

Final Takeaway​

Brent Crude opened the period at 98.93 on 25 May, reached a recent high of 100.62 on 26 May, then dropped sharply to a recent low of 94.57 on 27 May before recovering to 97.15 by 08:00 GMT on 28 May. From the recent high to the recent low, Brent fell -6.05 points, equal to -6.01%. From the original 25 May open to the 28 May current price, Brent was lower by -1.78 points, equal to -1.80%.

Overall, Brent’s movement from 25 May to 28 May 2026 was mainly driven by the shift between diplomacy and conflict risk. Hopes for a U.S.–Iran framework and a possible reopening of the Strait of Hormuz pushed prices sharply lower, while fresh U.S.–Iran strikes later revived supply-risk concerns and helped Brent recover from the low.

​

Profit Study:​

Imagine catching Brent Crude Oil near the recent high at 100.62 before the drop.

With just $503.10 margin on 1:200 leverage, a standard lot position would have given traders exposure to a powerful $3,470 market range as Brent moved from 100.62 to 97.15.

That is the power of volatility. You did not need to catch the full move perfectly — even a partial position inside that range could have created serious opportunity for traders who were prepared.


Peace in the region = Oil Sell. New tensions = Oil Rise. Which side are you on?


The chart below illustrates Brent Crude Oil’s price movement on a 1-hour candlestick timeframe from 25 May to 28 May 2026.